Oslo, Norway – October 8, 2025. As the world awaits the announcement of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday, October 10, two polarizing figures dominate the speculation: U.S. President Donald Trump and climate activist Greta Thunberg.
With nominations closed since January 31 and the
Norwegian Nobel Committee deep in deliberations, the hypothetical matchup has
ignited global debate.
Trump, a self-proclaimed peacemaker, boasts a string of
diplomatic wins, while Thunberg champions the urgent link between climate
action and global stability.
But who truly merits Alfred Nobel's legacy of fostering
fraternity among nations? This article breaks down the selection process, their
histories, and the multifaceted arguments for and against each contender.
The Nobel Peace
Prize Selection Process: A Veil of Secrecy and Scrutiny:
The Nobel Peace Prize, established by Alfred Nobel's 1895
will, is uniquely awarded by the five-member Norwegian Nobel Committee,
appointed by Norway's Parliament. Unlike other Nobel categories, it emphasizes
contributions to international fraternity, arms reduction, or peace congresses.
The process begins in September of the prior year, when
qualified nominators over 300 annually, including heads of state, academics,
and past laureates, receive invitations to submit candidates.
Nominations, limited to 338 individuals and 94
organizations for 2025, must arrive by January 31. Self-nominations are barred,
and names remain secret for 50 years to shield deliberations from external
pressure.
From February to August, an advisory panel of
international experts screens entries, producing shortlists. The committee then
debates in closed sessions at the Nobel Institute, consulting confidential
reports.
The final decision requires a majority vote, with the laureate
announced in early October and the ceremony held on December 10 in Oslo. This
eight-month gauntlet prioritizes verifiable impact over publicity, often
favoring unsung heroes over celebrities.
Donald Trump's
Path to Nomination: Leveraging Diplomatic Boldness:
Trump's Nobel aspirations trace back to his first term,
with at least 12 formal nominations by 2025. Early bids in 2018 and 2020 cited
his North Korea summits, while 2021 focused on the Abraham Accords normalizing
Israel-Arab ties.
Recent pushes include Pakistani officials crediting him
for de-escalating India-Pakistan tensions in 2019 and Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu's 2025 endorsement for a purported Israel-Iran ceasefire.
For 2025, nominations surged post-January inauguration,
including from U.S. Congresswoman Claudia Tenney for "groundbreaking peace
efforts" and hostage families urging recognition for his hostage-release
diplomacy.
These come from diverse sources: authoritarian allies
like Pakistan's government and U.S. lawmakers, highlighting Trump's
"America First" realpolitik.
Donald Trump's
Strengths in the Selection: Tangible Deals and Ceasefires:
Proponents argue that Trump's unorthodox diplomacy yields
results where multilateralism fails. The Abraham Accords, brokering ties between
Israel, the UAE, Bahrain, and others, reduced Middle East hostilities without
traditional aid carrots.
His 2025 Iran-Israel truce, if verified, averted a
nuclear escalation, aligning with Nobel criteria for conflict prevention.
Advocates like Rep. Darrell Issa praise Trump's
"decisive action" in ending "seven wars," from Syria
withdrawals to Kosovo-Serbia pacts. In a volatile world, his deal-making, bypassing UN bureaucracy, embodies Nobel's vision of practical fraternity,
potentially swaying committee realists amid Russia's Ukraine war.
Donald Trump's
Weaknesses in the Selection: Controversy and Credibility Gaps:
Critics decry Trump's nominations as politically
motivated theater. Many backers hail from autocracies facing U.S. sanctions,
raising quid pro quo suspicions. His withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate accord fueled global tensions, undermining peace credentials.
Experts like Nobel historian Asle Toje note the
committee's aversion to "warmongers," citing Trump's inflammatory
rhetoric and January 6 legacy.
With 2025 odds at +2400 (4% chance), betting markets
reflect skepticism, as past nominees like Henry Kissinger won amid backlash, but
Trump's divisiveness may tip the scales against.
Greta Thunberg's Path to Nomination: Grassroots Mobilization
and Moral Authority:
Thunberg, now 22, earned her first nomination in 2019
from Norwegian MPs for sparking the "Fridays for Future" strikes,
linking climate inaction to future wars and refugees. Swedish lawmakers
followed in 2020 and 2021, lauding her global youth mobilization that pressured
G20 leaders.
For 2025, reports confirm her inclusion among top
contenders, nominated by Scandinavian parliamentarians for sustained advocacy
amid COP failures. Her 2019 "Alternative Nobel" from the Right Livelihood
Award underscores peer recognition, with backers emphasizing her role in UN
climate pacts.
Greta Thunberg's
Strengths in the Selection: Bridging Climate and Conflict:
Thunberg's case hinges on climate as a peace multiplier:
droughts spark migrations, resource wars, and instability, as seen in Sahel
conflicts.
Her movement has inspired 14 million protesters,
influencing EU Green Deals and Biden-era policies with verifiable impacts per Nobel
standards.
At 16, she galvanized a generation, earning UN
invitations and Malala-like symbolism. With odds at +1566 (6%), she edges Trump
in markets, appealing to the committee's progressive tilt, evident in 2021's
World Food Programme award for crisis prevention.
Greta Thunberg's
Weaknesses in the Selection: Youth and Symbolic Over Substance:
Detractors label her a "teen prophet" whose
influence wanes with age; post-2021, protests fizzled amid COVID, yielding no
binding treaties. Critics like commentator Richard Hanania argue that her
confrontational style, sailing across the Atlantic, berating leaders, stirs division,
not fraternity.
Nominations from left-leaning MPs risk politicization,
and at 22, she lacks Trump's state power. Betting sites rank her below
favorites like Doctors Without Borders (+1150), questioning if activism alone
suffices without resolved conflicts.
Expert Verdict:
Betting Odds and Polls Favor Thunberg Slightly:
Analysts predict neither will win; favorites include UNRWA or
Ukrainian activists, but Thunberg leads Trump 6% to 4% in odds. Social polls on
platforms like YouTube show Thunberg crushing Trump 70-30, citing moral
clarity. PBS experts deem Trump "remote," while Reuters floats
Thunberg for climate-virus nexus.
The Deserving Laureate:
Thunberg Edges Out for Long-Term Vision:
Ultimately, Thunberg merits the prize more. Trump's deals, while pragmatic, are fragile Abraham Accords falter amid Gaza and are tied to his personal ego. Thunberg's work addresses root causes: unchecked emissions threaten billions, fostering the "lasting peace" Nobel enshrines. In 2025's polycrisis, her urgent call for equity outshines transactional diplomacy, honoring the Nobel fraternity ideal. Yet, as history shows, the committee may surprise watch Friday's reveal.
Post a Comment