Hey everyone, I'm Caroline, a hardcore AI tools enthusiast from Houston, USA. I've been deep into AI-powered development for years now, testing everything from ChatGPT Coding to GitHub Copilot, Claude, and even experimental stuff like Aider.
But nothing prepared me for how Cursor AI completely
flipped my workflow. In 2026, with all the hype around agentic AI and
multimodal coding, I finally went all-in on Cursor after hearing devs rave
about it on Reddit and X. Why did I choose Cursor over sticking with VS Code +
Copilot? Simple. I wanted an editor that
doesn't just suggest code, it “understands” my entire project like a true pair
programmer.
After extensive hands-on testing on real projects (from
building full-stack web apps to refactoring legacy code), here's my
comprehensive, no-BS review. Buckle up, this thing is game-changing. Lovable AI
Table of Contents:
- Why I Switched to Cursor AI: My Personal Story
- First Impressions and Setup
- Free vs Paid: How Many Features Are Actually Free?
- Core Capabilities I Tested Extensively
- My Real-World Results and Examples
- Pros and Cons: The Good, The Bad, My Expert Opinion
- Common Issues I Faced (And Honest Fixes)
- My Suggestions for Getting the Most Out of the Cursor
- What's Coming Next? Exciting Future Features
- Recommendations for New Users
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Is Cursor Worth It in 2026?
Why I Switched to
Cursor AI | My Personal Story:
I remember back in 2024-2025, I was loyal to VS Code with
GitHub Copilot. It was solid, quick autocompletes, decent suggestions. But as
my projects grew (think multi-file Next.js apps with backend APIs), Copilot started to feel limited.
It only looked at the current file mostly, and multi-file
edits were a pain. I learned about Cursor from a viral X thread where a dev built
an entire app in hours. I thought, "No way." But I downloaded it,
imported my VS Code settings in one click, and boom. I was hooked. Cursor is
basically VS Code on steroids, forked with deep AI baked in.
It uses models like Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, and even
newer ones in 2026. For me, as someone who codes 8-10 hours daily, Cursor felt
like having an expert dev sitting next to me.
First Impressions
and Setup:
Setup was ridiculously easy. Download from cursor.com,
install, and it asks if you want to import your VS Code extensions, themes, and
key bindings. I said yes, and it felt like home instantly. The interface is
clean, familiar, but with AI shortcuts everywhere (Cmd+L for chat, Cmd+K for
quick edits, Tab for autocomplete). I started with the free version to test the
waters. Wayground AI
Free vs Paid: How
Many Features Are Actually Free?
This is a big one, people ask me. Cursor has a generous
free tier (called Hobby), but the real power is in Pro.
- Free Version Features(About 70% of core stuff, but limited):
- Basic Tab autocomplete (limited completions per month)
- Chat with codebase (can ask questions about your code)
- Basic Cmd+K edits (rewrite selected code)
- Limited Agent requests (the cool autonomous mode)
- Access to standard models
- Full VS Code compatibility (extensions, debugging, etc.)
In my experience, the free version is great for small
projects or learning. I built a simple Todo app with React and Node, completely
for free; it handled autocompletes and basic refactors fine. But once you hit
limits (like 500 fast requests or so), it slows down to "slow mode."
Paid Versions (Pro
at $20/month, my go-to):
- Unlimited fast Tab completions
- Unlimited Agent/Composer mode (multi-file autonomous edits, this is the killer feature)
- Higher usage quotas (500+ fast premium requests)
- Access to Pro Max models (faster, smarter)
- Priority support and bonus API usage
There are higher tiers like Pro Plus ($70 usage) and
Ultra for heavy users, but Pro is enough for most solos like me.
Comparison:
Free is like Copilot's basic plan, usable but throttled. Pro feels unlimited,
and at $20/month (cheaper than some coffees I buy), it's a steal compared to
Copilot's $10 but with way deeper integration.
|
Feature/Aspect |
Hobby
(Free) |
Pro
($20/mo – My Daily Driver) |
Pro+
($60/mo) |
Ultra
($200/mo) |
My
Notes from Testing |
|
Tab Autocompletions |
Limited (slows down after quota) |
Unlimited & fast |
Unlimited + 3x model usage |
Unlimited + 20x model usage |
Free is fine for small stuff; Pro
feels endless |
|
Agent/Composer Mode Requests |
Limited |
Extended limits + Background Agents |
Same + higher overall usage |
Priority new features + max usage |
This is the game-changer Pro unlocks multi-file magic |
|
Context Windows |
Standard |
Maximum |
Maximum |
Maximum |
Pro handles huge repos way better |
|
Model Access (Claude, GPT, etc.) |
Basic/limited usage |
Full access |
3x usage on premium models |
20x usage + priority |
I switch models freely on Pro |
|
Other Perks |
Basic chat, VS Code import |
Everything unlimited for
individuals |
Heavy usage boost |
Enterprise-level priority |
Pro is perfect for solo devs like
me |
|
Price |
$0 (no card needed) |
$20/month |
$60/month |
$200/month |
Pro is worth every rupee – 10x ROI in time saved |
Core Capabilities
I Tested Extensively:
Cursor shines in:
- Tab Autocomplete: Predicts multi-line code insanely well.
- Chat Sidebar: Ask anything about your codebase ("Explain this function" or "Find bugs here").
- Composer/Agent Mode: Describe a feature, and it plans + edits multiple files autonomously.
- Debug Mode: Describe a bug, it finds and fixes.
- CLI Integration: Run AI commands from the terminal.
- Codebase Indexing: Understands your whole project context.
I like how you can switch models on the fly | Claude for
reasoning, GPT for speed.
My Real-World
Results and Examples:
After months, my productivity jumped. Example 1: I was
refactoring a messy 5k-line legacy PHP project (client work). In VS Code, it'd
take days. With Cursor Pro's Agent, I said: "Modernize this to Laravel
standards, add tests, fix security issues." It scanned everything,
proposed a plan, and applied multi-file changes. I reviewed diffs and accepted the work in hours. Mind-blowing.
Example 2: Built a full-stack e-commerce demo (Next.js +
Prisma + Stripe). Started from scratch: "Create a product listing page
with a cart." Composer-generated components, API routes, and database schema are all connected. I barely wrote code myself. Gamma AI
Results From My Testing:
- Small projects: 3-5x faster on free.
- Medium/large: 8-10x faster on Pro (thanks to multi-file magic).
- Error reduction: AI catches bugs I miss.
Pros and Cons |The
Good, The Bad, My Expert Opinion:
Pros (Why I love it):
- Insane project-wide context | beats Copilot hands down for big repos.
- Agent mode feels futuristic | like coding with a super-smart teammate.
- Seamless VS Code transition | all my extensions work.
- Constant updates |they're shipping fast in 2026.
- Multi-model support | pick the best for the task.
Cons (Being
honest):
Sometimes inconsistent | AI hallucinates on edge cases
(especially Gemini models).
Can feel slow on massive repos (100k+ lines) without
optimization.
UI has some clutter with all the AI panels.
Pro is $20/month | double Copilot, but worth it for me.
Occasional bugs (like shortcut conflicts).
In my expert opinion, pros outweigh cons by miles if
you're serious about AI coding.
Common Issues I
Faced (And Honest Fixes)
I hit these:
- Hitting limits on free: Switched to Pro, problem solved.
- AI making wrong assumptions in multi-file edits: Always review diffs carefully, or add "@" mentions for specific files.
- Slow performance on large projects: Turn off unnecessary indexing or use "slow mode" wisely.
- Context loss in long chats: Start new chats or use Composer for big tasks.
One frustrating day, Agent looped on a circular
dependency, which took 3 iterations, but taught me better prompting.
My Suggestions for
Getting the Most Out of Cursor:
Master shortcuts:
Cmd+L chat, Ctrl+Enter apply edits.
Use detailed
prompts: "In file X, change Y while keeping Z."
Combine with manual coding, don't rely 100% on AI.
Enable codebase-wide indexing for magic.
Experiment with models. I prefer Claude for complex
reasoning.
What's Coming
Next? Exciting Future Features:
From their changelog and roadmap leaks, 2026 is wild:
Full multimodal (upload diagrams, mockups, even videos that AI
understands visuals).
Advanced agents with cloud handoff (run tasks remotely).
Better visual designer tools.
Deeper CLI agent modes.
Integration with more frontier models.
I can't wait; this will make Cursor the undisputed king.
Recommendations
for New Users:
- If you're a beginner: Start free, learn prompting.
- Intermediate: Go Pro immediately | The unlimited Agent is addictive.
- If you love VS Code: Switch, you'll never go back.
My recommendation:
Try free for a week on a side project. If it clicks like it did for me,
subscribe. Not for everyone (if you code tiny scripts, stick to free tools),
but for pros? Essential.
Frequently Asked
Questions"
Is Cursor better
than VS Code + Copilot?
Yes, for project-wide tasks. Copilot is cheaper and
faster for single-file edits, but Cursor's Composer crushes multi-file edits. I
ditched Copilot after a month.
How much faster
did you actually get?
Realistically, 5-10x on average. From idea to working
feature, hours instead of days.
Is the $20/month
Pro worth it over free?
Absolutely, if you code daily. Free is a teaser; Pro
unlocks the future.
Is Cursor Worth It
in 2026?
Cursor isn't just an editor; it's the future of coding.
In my experience, it's made me a better, faster developer. Sure, it has flaws,
but the pros are overwhelming. If you're serious about AI tools, download it
today. I've never looked back.
Thanks for reading my raw thoughts, drop comments if you've tried it!) What do you think, fellow coders? Is Cursor your daily driver, too?
My Final Quick
Take:
In 2026, if you're serious about AI coding, start with
free to test, but go Pro immediately for the full power. I went from skeptical
to addicted. Cursor made me ship features faster than ever. Pair this table with
those infographics above, screenshot it, and share with your dev friends!
What do you think this table matches your experience?
Post a Comment